Absolutely — here’s a formal draft for **runtime execution semantics and memory layout** for SIMD/shard acceleration of the unified execution plan over ENC-ASL-TGK-INDEX. This focuses on **parallel, deterministic, and snapshot-safe execution**.
---
# Runtime Execution Semantics & Memory Layout for SIMD/Shard Acceleration
---
## 1. Purpose
This specification defines:
* How operators in an execution plan are executed in memory
* How shards, SIMD, and filters are applied efficiently
* Determinism guarantees per snapshot
* Memory layout for index scans, filter evaluation, and traversal expansion
It is fully compatible with:
* **ENC-ASL-TGK-INDEX**
* **Merged ASL + TGK query execution plan**
* **C-struct operator definitions**
---
## 2. Memory Layout Principles
1.**Immutable segments**: Index segments are **read-only** during execution
2.**Shard-local buffers**: Each shard stores a segment of records in contiguous memory
3.**SIMD key arrays**: Routing keys, type tags, and edge type keys are stored in contiguous SIMD-aligned arrays for fast vectorized evaluation
4.**Canonical references**: artifact IDs and TGK edge IDs are stored in 64-bit aligned arrays for deterministic access
5.**Traversal buffers**: TGK traversal outputs are stored in logseq-sorted buffers to preserve determinism
---
## 3. Segment Loading and Sharding
* Each index segment is **assigned to a shard** based on routing key hash
* Segment header is mapped into memory; record arrays are memory-mapped if needed
| `tombstone_state` | canonical ID + logseq | shadowing |
* All buffers are **snapshot-bound and immutable where possible**
* SIMD/shard acceleration does not affect determinism
---
This completes a **full runtime execution model**, including **memory layout, SIMD/shard acceleration, traversal buffers, merge logic, tombstone handling, and projection/aggregation**.
---
Next steps could be:
1.**Formal operator pseudocode in C**, implementing SIMD and shard logic
2.**Memory-mapped index access routines** for ENC-ASL-TGK-INDEX
3.**Integration with PEL deterministic DAG execution receipts**
Do you want me to draft the **operator pseudocode next**?