Absolutely — here’s a **formal draft for integrating PEL deterministic DAG programs with the ASL + TGK execution plan**, including how PEL outputs feed into operators, while preserving snapshot safety, determinism, and memory efficiency.
---
# PEL-Integrated Execution Model with ASL + TGK
---
## 1. Purpose
This specification defines:
1. How **PEL programs** (deterministic DAG programs) are executed in conjunction with **ASL artifacts** and **TGK edges**.
2. How **PEL outputs (execution receipts)** feed into **index operators**.
3. How **snapshot safety, determinism, and DAG traversal** are preserved across layers.
4. Integration of **sharding, SIMD acceleration, and tombstone shadowing** in a unified execution model.
---
## 2. Key Concepts
* **PEL Program (PP)**: A deterministic DAG with **input artifacts**, **output artifacts**, and **computational nodes** (concat, slice, primitive ops).
* **PEL Execution Receipt (PER)**: Artifact recording program execution, including:
* Snapshot boundaries propagated across federation nodes
---
## 10. Summary
This integration:
* Treats **PEL programs as first-class DAG nodes** in execution plans
* Allows **PER artifacts** to feed seamlessly into index operators
* Preserves **snapshot safety, determinism, and shard/SIMD acceleration**
* Fully unifies **PEL execution** with **ASL artifact and TGK edge indexing**
* Enables **federated, replayable execution** across machines
---
Next step could be to **formalize federation propagation rules and cross-node deterministic replay**, ensuring PER artifacts are synchronized across pools and snapshots.